https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174974
--- Comment #3 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <[email protected]> --- Please reflow %description. Also please add some information about what the package does, except being a fork. Consider changing nosetests to nostests-%{python2_version} for clarity. Use %license for COPYING.txt Consider adding the following snippet: """ # Use the same directory of the main package for subpackage licence and docs %global _docdir_fmt %{name} """ Package doesn't build: the patch also changes .pyc file. Wouldn't it be better to simply skip the test using nosetest option instead of patching it out? I think python2-devel is preferred to python-devel. Otherwise looks OK, fedora-review has nothing interesting to say. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
