https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198342
--- Comment #7 from Christopher Meng <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Rüdiger Meier from comment #5) > "dateutils." prefix looks a bit ugly but at least Debian is using the same. > Other Distros are using it originally without prefix. Maybe they don't have > collisions or they didn't checked. I guess upstream could be also convinced > about adding a nice prefix. Surprisingly, my solution is even 'conflicting' with Debian ;) You could choose another prefix like 'dateutils-', or something shorter even. But it will confuse guys who just wanna use it, and also upstream, too. (In reply to Matthew Miller from comment #6) > It's not just that it looks ugly; it's also unwieldy for a command-line tool > that by its nature is likely to get typed a lot (rather than a > special-purpose util like the mentioned dapl-utils). Christopher, as I > understand it there's no _current_ conflicts here; do you have a strong > opinion on just leaving it? I don't have experience with handling conflicting binary names in Fedora, as anything with such name conflicts would be a vexed problem... But I don't want to see a solution like 'ninja-build' in Fedora as well, it's undue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
