https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194798
--- Comment #7 from Paul Howarth <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Philip Prindeville from comment #6) > Spec file looks okay. Have you run rpmlint on both files? $ rpmlint GeoIP-GeoLite-data GeoIP-GeoLite-data-extra GeoIP-GeoLite-data.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) geolocation -> echolocation, collocation, allocation GeoIP-GeoLite-data.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US geolocation -> echolocation, collocation, allocation GeoIP-GeoLite-data.noarch: W: non-etc-or-var-file-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/GeoIP/GeoIP.dat GeoIP-GeoLite-data.noarch: W: no-documentation GeoIP-GeoLite-data-extra.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) geolocation -> echolocation, collocation, allocation GeoIP-GeoLite-data-extra.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US geolocation -> echolocation, collocation, allocation GeoIP-GeoLite-data-extra.noarch: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings. Nothing to worry about there I think; all present in the old GeoIP package. > Also, what's the script to run over the package to review it and do the > automated checks? It's fedora-review (in the same-named package). I've never used it myself so that's all I can say about it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
