https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893399
--- Comment #5 from Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #3) > > Shouldn't the name of this spec be pcsc-lite-asekey similar to > > pcsc-lite-ccid? It's a driver of pcsc-lite after all. > Guidelines recommends to stick to upstream name. Also it's driver for any > PCSC service talking IFD interface. I'm not sure about that. From the spec file this is clearly a pcsc-lite addon and the guidelines mention: "If a new package is considered an "addon" package that enhances or adds a new functionality to an existing Fedora package without being useful on its own, its name should reflect this fact." We do the same with 'pcsc-lite-ccid', even though ccid is the upstream name. Using pcsc-ifd-asekey would also be acceptable, but I don't believe that "asekey" for a pcsc driver is right. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
