https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203476
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Meng <[email protected]> --- (In reply to James Hogarth from comment #4) > Apologies if you feel I 'stole' this from you or something but with all due > respect the bug you had open: > > 1) Last update from you was this time last year. > 2) The spec and srpm files had not been accessible for some time. > 3) I had commented on your bug (which would have sent you mail) September > last year. > 4) Your reviewer had commented on your bug November last year. > 5) Since there was no response and the domain for your site listed is not > even a valid domain any more (NXDOMAIN) both your reviewer and I felt that > you were no longer interested in this. I actually have lots of domains in my hand, but I often change the one I use. I'm still interested in this, in 1.16, upstream didn't include GPL license text, and then I waited for months to see the import of the text, you could check the github issues page of sslh. > I would be happy to co-maintain this if you are interested in taking it up > again as that would be a nice way to become a Fedora package maintainer - > although this is a small enough package that I believe I can handle Fedora > maintenance of it sufficiently if you prefer not to assist. Ok, I believe I can finish this, I hope I can submit it again. Meanwhile I hope you can be a packager as well by submit other packages. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
