https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199567



--- Comment #15 from Alec Leamas <[email protected]> ---
As for the need for license text as described and linked in comment #10: this
review took place before the guidelines was changed [1]. At the point of that
review, guidelines required license text to be part of %doc (and there was no
%license tag). However, the guidelines  changed by February, 15 2015 [1]. After
this change, the license text should (only) go to %license, and not %doc. 

Is this the root of this confusion?

[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Packaging%3ALicensingGuidelines&diff=400807&oldid=323319

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to