https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204614
Ondrej Oprala <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Ondrej Oprala <[email protected]> --- [ ]: Changelog in prescribed format. >>> OK [ ]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified. Note: No (noreplace) in %config /usr/share/gofed/config/gofed.conf >>> OK [ ]: Package does not generate any conflict. >>> OK gofed.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/share/gofed/parseGo also fixed :) fedora-review also ran the Python plugin this time: Python: [ ]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. >>> OK [ ]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. >>> OK [ ]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python >>> OK [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep Thanks, I don't see any further issue. APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
