https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207847
Raphael Groner <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #2 from Raphael Groner <[email protected]> --- This is an informal review of your spec file without any required modification. all is SHOULD only. * Please use a more specific name to avoid any confusion. Auto is too generically though it is the upstream name. Suggestion for a descriptive name: auto-code-generators https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines > Name: auto * Use the %{url} macro to shorten the links. > URL: https://github.com/google/auto > Source0: > https://github.com/google/auto/archive/auto-value-%{version}.tar.gz URL: https://github.com/google/%{name} Source0: %{url}/archive/auto-value-%{version}.tar.gz * Use the %{name} macro consistently: pleae replace all occurances of auto (or the final package name we chose) with the %{name} macro. * Be more specific in the summaries of the subpackages. Given one word only seems to be too few for a descriptive summary. If in doubt, you could use %{summary} then for the %description text to have the text there, too. * Are there no dependencies between the subpackages? Why is there a common subpackage? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
