https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208738
--- Comment #7 from Taylor Braun-Jones <tay...@braun-jones.org> ---
Looking into the details of vera++, the Fedora Tcl guidelines, and the
%{name}-plugins subpackage option:
* A tcl-%{name} package does not apply because vera++ includes a build-in Tcl
interpretter.
* I'm not sure a %{name}-plugins subpackage makes sense either because the
out-of-the-box expected behavior is to be able to run a default set of checks
and transformations be simply running `vera++ foo.cpp`
I've updated the spec and srpm links with the latest fixes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
