https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208701
--- Comment #11 from Raphael Groner <[email protected]> --- Sorry, I've to make two corrections … (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #5) > [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. > Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: > "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated". 17 files have unknown license. > Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/gil/1208701-jpype-py3/review- > jpype-py3/licensecheck.txt > jpype-py3-ca6fc96a76d430c753b56ec2a4ed2a3eced0dac3/native/cygwin/jni_md.h > GPLv2 > > jpype-py3-ca6fc96a76d430c753b56ec2a4ed2a3eced0dac3/native/python/include/capsulethunk.h > GPL/Python … > [?]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. > see above > jni_md.h is part of JDK > capsulethunk.h is part of Python > https://hg.python.org/cpython/file/b4cbecbc0781/Doc/includes/capsulethunk.h As those both files are GPL'ed, I'll add GPLv2 to License: and mention both files in a comment. > [?]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. Not sure how setup.py does extra debuginfo for all languages involved here (cpp, java, python), rpmbuild must find any if there. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
