https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213595

Kevin Fenzi <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+



--- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <[email protected]> ---
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name. 
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. 
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. 
OK - License (GPLv2+)
OK - License field in spec matches
See below - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
9df8930cab9db47dbc6173c45afb5945  intersection-REL1_23-1a507c8.tar.gz

OK - BuildRequires correct
OK - Package is code or permissible content. 
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. 
OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install

OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. 
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. 
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. 
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. 
OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions)
See below - No rpmlint output. 
OK - final provides and requires are sane.

SHOULD Items:

OK - Should build in mock. 
OK - Should build on all supported archs
OK - Should function as described. 
OK - Should have sane scriptlets. 
OK - Should have dist tag
OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or
/usr/sbin

Issues: 

1. Might ask upstream to include a copy of the GPLv2 (nonblocker)

2. Your comment in changelog says "1.23", but this is 1.7.0. (nonblocker)
(please fix on import)

3. rpmlint says: 

mediawiki123-intersection.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
bulleted -> billeted, bullet ed, bullet-ed
mediawiki123-intersection.noarch: W: no-documentation
mediawiki123-intersection.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bulleted
-> billeted, bullet ed, bullet-ed
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.

All can be ignored. 

I don't see any blockers here, so this package is APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to