Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=581220 Christophe Dumez <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #21 from Christophe Dumez <[email protected]> 2010-07-20 16:47:48 EDT --- I think there may be an issue for programs using QtCore but not QtGui. The qtsingleapplication solution provides both QtCore and QtGui classes, for example, QtSingleApplication and QtSingleCoreApplication. According to the examples provided by Nokia for qtsingleapplication, only the programs using the QtSingleApplication class need to link against the so file, the programs using only QtSingleCoreApplication don't. The issue is that your qtsingleapplication-devel package only provide qtsingleapplication.prf, no qtsinglecoreapplication.prf file. qtsinglecoreapplication.prf file would contain only: INCLUDEPATH *= $$QMAKE_INCDIR_QT/QtSolutions DEPENDPATH *= $$QMAKE_INCDIR_QT/QtSolutions QT *= network instead of: INCLUDEPATH *= $$QMAKE_INCDIR_QT/QtSolutions DEPENDPATH *= $$QMAKE_INCDIR_QT/QtSolutions LIBS *= -lQtSolutions_SingleApplication-2.6 QT *= network I believe Programs that don't use QtGui should not depend on the qtsingleapplication package (which provides the so file) because it requires QtGui. What do you think about this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
