https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242086

            Bug ID: 1242086
           Summary: Review Request: parcimonie.sh - Refresh your GnuPG
                    keyring over Tor
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
         Component: Package Review
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
          Assignee: [email protected]
          Reporter: [email protected]
        QA Contact: [email protected]
                CC: [email protected]



Spec URL: https://thofmann.fedorapeople.org/parcimonie.sh.spec
SRPM URL:
https://thofmann.fedorapeople.org/parcimonie.sh-0-0.2.20150710gitd7d83f0.fc22.src.rpm

Description:
parcimonie.sh refreshes individual keys in your GnuPG keyring at randomized
intervals. Each key is refreshed over a unique, single-use Tor circuit.

rpmlint produces some warnings:
parcimonie.sh.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) keyring -> keying, key
ring, key-ring
--> I think keyring should be allowed, see e.g. gnome-keyring
parcimonie.sh.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US parcimonie ->
parsimonious
--> that's the actual package name
parcimonie.sh.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary parcimonie.sh
--> upstream does not provide a manpage

I do not use any of the systemd scriptlets because there is no default service,
but only a service template.

Versioning: Upstream does not provide any versioning. In Arch Linux's AUR [1],
the package version is constructed from the git commit hash, so I followed the
guideline for prerelease snapshots. 

Fedora Account System Username: thofmann

Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10332413


Comments and a review would be highly appreciated!


[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/parcimonie-sh-git/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to