Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618638 Marcela Mašláňová <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Marcela Mašláňová <[email protected]> 2010-07-28 04:20:17 EDT --- - rpmlint checks return: - package meets naming guidelines OK - package meets packaging guidelines OK - license (Artistic 2.0) OK, text in %doc, matches source OK - spec file legible, in am. english OK - source matches upstream bc1d60d004b8b4d6aa8c11f3c4ccbc5f OK - package compiles on devel (x86) OK http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2355937 - no missing BR OK - no unnecessary BR OK - no locales OK - not relocatable OK - owns all directories that it creates OK - no duplicate files OK - permissions ok OK - %clean ok OK - macro use consistent OK - code, not content OK - no need for -docs OK - nothing in %doc affects runtime OK - no need for .desktop file OK Comments: Kwalitee tests don't have to run. Patches should be sent to upstream, but I suppose your patch make this module work with older releases in EPEL, so they won't be applied in upstream anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
