https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174974
--- Comment #15 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Alan Pevec from comment #14) > > scripts check whether the bug-reporter > > So we're slaves to the scripts?! > No wonder we're turning away potential contributors with such artificial > obstacles :( I think everybody agrees that this is an unnecessary obstacle. At last Flock somebody (it might have been sgallagh, I don't remember for sure) said that they added that check and it could be removed. But it's there atm. Like I said, I'll review the new ticket, so it's just a question of filling out https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora&format=fedora-review and copying comment #12. I think that should hardly matter compared to the amount of work required for a package. > > - you removed the removal of egg-info in %prep. It is customary to do remove > > it in %prep to be sure that no stale info ends up in the binary package. > > That was a misguided custom, python guidelines has been clarified in > https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/488 (relevant here is point 5.) > > Egg metadata from upstream should be preserved, in some cases ( e.g. > packages using PBR.) you can't reconstruct it completely when building from > a sdist tarball. OK. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
