https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128337
Christopher Meng <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Christopher Meng <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group) from comment #7) > > [-]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires and Requires:. > > Note: Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; > > echo $version)) missing? > > > libnsgif-devel.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency > > /usr/share/doc/libnsgif-devel/examples/disassemble_gif.pl perl(strict) > > libnsgif-devel.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency > > /usr/share/doc/libnsgif-devel/examples/disassemble_gif.pl perl(warnings) > > libnsgif-devel.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency > > /usr/share/doc/libnsgif-devel/examples/disassemble_gif.pl /usr/bin/perl > > > libnsgif-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): > > /usr/bin/perl > > This is about what David Tardon has pointed out in comment 2. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Documentation > > | Files marked as documentation must not cause the package to pull in > | more dependencies than it would without the documentation. One simple > | way to ensure this in most cases is to remove all executable permissions > | from files in %_pkgdocdir. He obviously pasted the initial review log, I've verified that my chmod -x fixes the problem. $ rpmlint -v ./libnsgif-devel-0.1.2-1.fc24.i686.rpm libnsgif-devel.i686: I: checking libnsgif-devel.i686: I: checking-url http://www.netsurf-browser.org/projects/libnsgif/ (timeout 10 seconds) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
