https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256255
Jitka Plesnikova <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova <[email protected]> --- Source file is ok Summary is ok License is ok. Description is ok URL and Source0 are ok All tests passed FIX: Please add BR 'make' Otherwise BRs are ok $ rpm -qp --requires perl-DBIx-Class-OptimisticLocking-0.02-1.fc24.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.0) 1 perl(Carp) 1 perl(DBIx::Class) >= 0.08195 1 perl(List::Util) 1 perl(base) 1 perl(strict) 1 perl(warnings) 1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 Binary requires are Ok. $ rpm -qp --provides perl-DBIx-Class-OptimisticLocking-0.02-1.fc24.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(DBIx::Class::OptimisticLocking) = 0.02 1 perl-DBIx-Class-OptimisticLocking = 0.02-1.fc24 Binary provides are Ok. $ rpmlint perl-DBIx-Class-OptimisticLocking* perl-DBIx-Class-OptimisticLocking.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/perl-DBIx-Class-OptimisticLocking/LICENSE 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. Rpmlint is almost ok TODO: Please report the wrong address to upstream. Please correct all 'FIX' issues and consider fixing 'TODO' items Otherwise, the package looks good. Package APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
