https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221781
Raphael Groner <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] Flags| |needinfo?(hobbes1069@gmail. | |com) --- Comment #10 from Raphael Groner <[email protected]> --- A polite reminder that this review is still open. Please provide new links. You're right about the tarball name and the corresponding package naming guideline. Though, it's somehow confusing with the upstream project name as also Zipios++ (with the ++) like the existing package zipios++ with clearly another upstream. You should at least clearly include that in %description text that this project is a fork of original zipios++ or the like, as you did in comment #1. The name zipios is not used yet in PkgDB, so we could temporarily keep going with it, but should expect some possible future conflicts about functional understanding of the packages differences that could lead into package renaming with now avoidable trouble, this risk decision is up to you as the maintainer. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
