Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589866 --- Comment #17 from Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich <[email protected]> 2010-08-03 08:12:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libdarktable.so libdarktable.so > > I think is because it needs a version number (libdarktable-0.5.3.so ?) I think it is a result of wrong position. I do not see why it need to be versionized. > The shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libdarktable.so > e...@glibc_2.2.5 > > You could find the exit call in the library, and patch it out.. Whule this library is used only for darktable itself there is no need for such cleanup (but, it is done in git). I suppose now it could be acceptable. > W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/darktable.schemas It is not config fle in general meaning. Warning have no scence. So, %config(noreplace) not needed. I'v looked in couple of packages (i.e. shotwell), contained scemas, they done as %{_sysconfdir} only. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
