https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269964

            Bug ID: 1269964
           Summary: Rebase clufter package
           Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
           Version: 6.8
         Component: clufter
          Keywords: Rebase
          Severity: medium
          Priority: high
          Assignee: [email protected]
          Reporter: [email protected]
        QA Contact: [email protected]
                CC: [email protected], [email protected],
                    [email protected], [email protected],
                    [email protected],
                    [email protected],
                    [email protected], [email protected],
                    [email protected], [email protected],
                    [email protected], [email protected]
        Depends On: 1182358



Upstream development of clufter has progressed (since 6.7 package till 7.2
package + something more likely to come) so this asks for a rebase.

More specifically, clufter received plentiful bug fixes and enhancements
compared to previous RHEL minor release (6.7/clufter-0.11.2-1.el6),
notably:

- configuration of bind-mount, nfsclient, SAPDatabase and SAPInstance
  rgmanager-compatible resource agents is now migrated in ccs2pcs
  command family
- ccs-/cib-/pcs-2pcscmd command families (modulo ccs-/pcs-2pcscmd-flatiron
  pre-existing commands) were added and allow one to produce a sequence
  of pcs commands to (re)instate the cluster configuration akin to the
  existing one as truly as possible
- ccs-disable-rg command was added to allow invocation separately
  from commands that call the underlying operation implicitly


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182358
[Bug 1182358] New package request: clufter - Tool for
transforming/analyzing cluster configuration formats
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to