https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277487
--- Comment #5 from Shawn Iwinski <[email protected]> --- [!]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. Note: rm -rf %{buildroot} present but not required [!]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 Note: %defattr present but not needed [!]: Buildroot is not present Note: Buildroot: present but not needed [!]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) Note: %clean present but not required As usual, remove EPEL 5 bits after initial import. Not a blocker. [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "GPL (v2 or later)", "Unknown or generated", "GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)", "*No copyright* GPL (v2 or later)", "GPL (v2)", "*No copyright* Apache (v2.0)". 75 files have unknown license. Library is GPLv2+ not MIT. In tests there are also some Apache, BSD, GPL, and MIT licenced files though. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
