Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572515 --- Comment #22 from Aidan Delaney <[email protected]> 2010-08-05 18:20:43 EDT --- I've taken that Debian patch and made it Fedora specific. It's all in http://culturalinformatics.org.uk/~ajd9/jogl-1.1.1a-2.fc15.src.rpm. However, the this doesn't work well. On Debian jni libraries are installed to /usr/lib/jni and this is added to LD_LIBRARY_PATH. On Fedora we install jni related libs to /usr/lib/gluegen/libgluegen.so (in this case). So we need to add the java.library.path modifications earlier than the Debian peeps. Therefore, I put it in a static initialiser block. However, where I've added it is too late. So question. Do I find an early entry point into jogl in which to modify java.library.path or do we require users to specify -Djava.library.path=... as a parameter to java? I'm happy with the latter as identifying an early entry point into jogl assumes too much about how users are going to consume it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
