https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276081
--- Comment #7 from Karsten Hopp <kars...@redhat.com> ---
rpmlint looks ok now.
The only issue remaining is the last one from comment #5:
Please note that it is impossible to install these texlive-extension packages
on CentOS or in an epel-7 mock chroot as Centos hasn't updated
texlive-kpathsea-lib:
Error: Package: texlive-cyrillic-bin-bin-svn27329.0-1.el7.centos.noarch
(/texlive-cyrillic-bin-bin-svn27329.0-1.el7.centos.noarch)
Requires: texlive-kpathsea-lib >=
2:2012-38.20130427_r30134.el7.centos
Available: 2:texlive-kpathsea-lib-2012-32.20130427_r30134.el7.i686
(base)
texlive-kpathsea-lib = 2:2012-32.20130427_r30134.el7
Manually installing texlive-kpathsea-lib.x86_64 into the mock chroot resulted
in a different error that shows the real issue:
Error: Package: texlive-cyrillic-bin-bin-svn27329.0-1.el7.centos.noarch
(/texlive-cyrillic-bin-bin-svn27329.0-1.el7.centos.noarch)
Requires: texlive-kpathsea-lib >=
2:2012-32.20130427_r30134.el7.centos
Installed: 2:texlive-kpathsea-lib-2012-32.20130427_r30134.el7.x86_64
(@base)
texlive-kpathsea-lib = 2:2012-32.20130427_r30134.el7
in the mock chroot:
# rpm --eval %dist
.el7.centos
So there's a mismatch between the provides of official EPEL packages and the
requirements in mock builds if the packages use %dist in the
Provides:/Requires: fields.
I think we need to waive this issue although it is quite unfortunate. The
package review guidelines only require that the package builds in mock, not
that it is installable ;-(
comment #2 is now valid for all other subpackages. The 5 mentioned are fixed
now and use the release tag. All others have Release 1%{dist} hardcoded
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
