https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
Mohammed Safwat <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #11 from Mohammed Safwat <[email protected]> --- I'd also like to see this package added to fedora repos. Version 1.2.0 has now been released https://github.com/atom/atom/releases/tag/v1.2.0. Also as illustrated here https://github.com/atom/atom/blob/v1.2.0/docs/build-instructions/linux.md, the build instructions have been much simplified from what's included in the spec file in this review. The license mentioned in the spec file is MIT, although I can't see this clear anywhere in the sources. The licensing terms here https://github.com/atom/atom/blob/v1.2.0/LICENSE.md are a little confusing as I can't clearly map to one of the good licenses approved by fedora packaging committee https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#Good_Licenses. Is there anything I can do to reactivate this review? It's been a while since Helber was active in addressing the review findings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
