https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269649
--- Comment #17 from Antonio Trande <[email protected]> --- >> - -doc subpackage must not require main package; it's >> standalone and must provide an own license file. >> >done for the first issue, the second one is a bit tricky, I have to ask old >>upstream which license can be used, the pdf-file (and the appropriate >>*.sxw-file) was downloadable without special license. I just split the >package, >because it was too large and it was in old aeskulap package without >special >license. Use the 'Public Domain' license. >> [!]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. >> Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in >> aeskulap-debuginfo >How do I do it? It's an autogenerated package. Nothing. It's a my mistake. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
