https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279755
--- Comment #2 from Mamoru TASAKA <[email protected]> --- Hello. First, thank you for comments! (In reply to Steve Traylen from comment #1) > Just curios, the %{nil} in the for loop is just to make future diffs clean > or something else? Yes (to make future diffs clean) > The LICENSE is seems confused > > https://github.com/tenderlove/racc/blob/master/Rakefile#L20 > is MIT. Rakefile is just as "Makefile" and usually we don't take this into account with regard to license tag. > https://github.com/tenderlove/racc/blob/master/README.rdoc > is GPL v2 This is LGPLv2 (GNU "Lesser") > > and finally > https://github.com/tenderlove/racc/blob/master/COPYING > is GPL v2+ This is also LGPLv2 (GNU "Lesser") > > The .spec file has > LGPLv2 and (Ruby or GPLv2) So license file and README.rdoc says this is LGPLv2, however some files are under old ruby license (which is under "Ruby" and GPLv2, e.g. ext/racc/cparse.c), so this should be LGPLv2 and (GPLv2 or Ruby) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
