https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290995
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |POST CC| |[email protected] Assignee|[email protected] |[email protected] Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <[email protected]> --- + license is OK (BSD) + license file is missing, but the only source file has a prominent license header + latest version (upstream is semi-dead, but I think it doesn't really mean much for scientific software) + new python packaging template is used + provides/requires are OK + builds and install OK + no scriptlets + fedora review is happy Rpmlint ------- Checking: python2-visionegg-quest-1.1-1.fc24.noarch.rpm python3-visionegg-quest-1.1-1.fc24.noarch.rpm python-visionegg-quest-1.1-1.fc24.src.rpm python2-visionegg-quest.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Quest.py 644 /usr/bin/env python3-visionegg-quest.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/Quest.py 644 /usr/bin/env I guess you could fix that. python2-visionegg-quest.noarch: W: no-documentation python3-visionegg-quest.noarch: W: no-documentation python3-visionegg-quest.noarch: W: python-bytecode-without-source /usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/__pycache__/Quest.cpython-35.opt-1.pyc 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 3 warnings. Package is APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
