https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294577
[email protected] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #1 from [email protected] --- Funny that this should pop up again. I was just reviewing the state of packages in my copr, and noticed you followed up with a new ticket. The package from the previous review has been living happily in this copr: https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/barsnick/non-fed/package/jmtpfs/ I need it because the gvfs based (automatic) mounting of my Android phone just "doesn't work" - you can see the files, but any access is denied. I never bothered to open up a bugzilla ticket for it yet, but jmtpfs, using the same libraries, just works (with quirks). There's one thing about your SPEC file - it picks up the same version-release (0.4-2) as the last one in the previous review. But that's just a nit-pick. Apart from that, it fixes ALL those things (and more) I was just fixing when re-reviewing the old SPEC: - use versioned BRs - don't Require fuse (it would have been fuse-libs, and it would have been automatic anyway) - use a better URL - package more %docs. Nice! I have built your package in my copr for my personal pleasure (and those who happen to use it): https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/barsnick/non-fed/build/151119/ I too want this to go upstream, but perhaps fixing the gvfs-based default module should also be a goal. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
