https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273579
--- Comment #12 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl> --- (In reply to Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) from comment #11) > I'm happy to continue the review if another reviewer comes along, I don't understand this sentence. Raphael said that he can review the package in comment #8. If he cannot do it, I'm sure that somebody else (e.g. me) would step up. > but I do > think a re-review will be in order (even if unofficially) if the build > system and change. Nah, the build system is not visible in the binary package. As long as it builds nobody cares (except the maintainer of course). > Is the plan to get all the neuroscience packages into Fedora by F24, though > - or can we have a "group copr" thing running and transition packages over > as they pass review? I don't think there's a plan to get "all" neuroscience packages into Fedora, there's probably too many to even consider that. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NeuroFedora doesn't have a specific list. New packages can be added at any time, and there's quite a bit of time before Fedora 24 release (2016-05-17). I don't know about any plans to have a group copr. I see coprs as a good mechanism to provide alternative versions of already packaged software, or often updated software, or things which are inappropriate for main Fedora for other reasons. I don't think nest or other science related software falls into any of those categories, and making a "detour" through copr would be mostly a waste of time. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
