https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305334



--- Comment #14 from Mukundan Ragavan <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to José Matos from comment #8)
> (In reply to Mukundan Ragavan from comment #5)
> > I did *not* want it to be labeled as %doc. 
> > 
> > What I meant to say was "fedora-review warning was bogus". It was clear to
> > me when I wrote that comment. But, as I read it now, I realize how it
> > sounds! :(
> 
> I am sorry if I sound it otherwise, my comment was meant to be constructive.
> :-)
> 
> And we all know how written communication is poor medium at conveying
> information.
> 
> With that said I would like to thank you for addressing this review since
> R-cpp is a direct dependency of more than 500 R packages and some of my R
> packages are starting to depend on it. So I am glad that this is going
> forward. :-D

No worries. Certainly appreciate the input!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to