https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295456
--- Comment #8 from William Moreno <williamjmore...@gmail.com> ---
The package named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK
The spec file name must match the base package %{name} OK
The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license OK
The License field match the actual license OK
The spec file must be written in American English OK
The spec file for the package MUST be legible OK
The package build in rawhide OK
BuildRequires OK
No bundled libraries OK
Directories ownership OK
Permissions on files OK
Consistently use macros OK
Source is code nor binary OK
Need work:
The text of the license must be included in %license.
See:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text
Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. There is a sphinx doc
than you can build and include as subpackage.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
