Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624461 --- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell <[email protected]> 2010-08-23 01:49:41 EDT --- > [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets > other > legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. > [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. > License type: GPL+ or Artistic > > Note that the header of lib/Lingua/Stem/Snowball/No.pm says GPLv2 only while > the pod embedded in the file says "under the same terms as Perl itself". > Given that the module's META.yml says "license: perl", I'm going with the > latter but it would be nice to notify upstream so that it can clarify this. Well spotted. https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=60626 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
