Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Comment #52 from Lorenzo Villani <[email protected]> 2010-08-23 06:48:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #51) > > So, by that very logic, it should be "satsolver-libs" in Fedora. > AFAIK, the "-libs" suffix is used when an application also happens to ship libraries usable by 3rd parties. So for pure libraries only "name" and "name-devel" are necessary, IIRC. > Feel free to suggest; discussion was already started on similar hot topic > http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-buildservice/2010-07/msg00179.html Following the "if it ain't broken, don't fix it" motto, I'd like to push this package as "satsolver" (not "sat-solver") and rename it only if needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
