https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307238
--- Comment #14 from Alexander Ploumistos <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Nicolas Mailhot from comment #11) > metapackages are a convenience and one's convenience is another's annoyance. > If you do that you *must* make sure the individual font packages can still > be installed separately without dragging in other stuff some users do not > need. > > The Fedora fonts packaging policy is explicitly designed to permit > fine-grained font installation, without locking users in specific font > groups, to let users choose fonts on their individual merits. The font > package naming already makes it easy to identify fonts of the same origin. A > metapackage does not add a lot except hardwiring someone's preferencies. In all honesty, I'm not particularly anxious to create that metapackage. I thought that since Mr. Douros considers these fonts as a set, there might be others who would too. I'm actually happy to lay that thought to rest. Just out of curiosity though, how would such a metapackage complicate things? Wouldn't it work like the libreoffice metapackage which doesn't have to be installed in order to get some features of the suite? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
