https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317939



--- Comment #2 from Benji Wiebe <[email protected]> ---
Thanks for taking the time to look at this...

Description: See if you like the new description better. The acronyms are what
most users would recognize, so I left them in, but added some more words to
make it plainer for those who aren't familiar with it.

Version: Using the format YYYYMMDDgitSHORTCOMMIT now.

BuildRequires/Requires are now split out onto separate lines.
What you said about diffability makes good sense.

I wasn't aware of %make_build, fixed.

Patch1 and Patch2 are both add-one-file patches, so I moved both to Source1 and
Source2 respectively.

For Systemd, I'm not sure I've got it right yet. I had been going off
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Systemd#Packaging but apparently that
is out-of-date information?


Switched to %license for the COPYING file.

The default ownership of %{_datarootdir}/%{name} and
%{_datarootdir}/%{name}/public_html looks correct to me. It show be owned by
root:root and everyone should have read permissions but not write permissions.



Also I removed the two Requires:, as they were unnecessary. Good ol' rpmlint.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to