https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316676
--- Comment #3 from Nikolai Kondrashov <[email protected]> --- Thank you, Soumya! I'll work on the issues. However, I have a few questions: * I'd like to have the same .spec file work on RHEL6 and using %license breaks it there. Is %license required? If yes, is there a good way to make its use conditional? * What needs to be done regarding the licencecheck.txt contents? I.e. regarding some files missing the license notice and one file having the MIT/X11 license (which is included into any package using autotools, actually)? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
