https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304097
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |[email protected] Assignee|[email protected] |[email protected] Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <[email protected]> --- Is it really worth the trouble to split the plugin-framework and dicom and widgets subpackages? There're couple hundred kb each. Summary is not very useful. Maybe: Summary: Library for medical image analysis, surgical navigation, and related purposes Doc subpackage must be noarch! + license is acceptable (ASL 2) + license file is present, %license is used + package name follows guidelines + provides/requires look OK + scriptlets look OK + dependencies between subpackages look OK + latest version rpmlint: ctk-devel.i686: W: no-documentation ctk-dicom.i686: W: no-documentation ctk-plugin-framework.i686: W: no-documentation ctk-widgets.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) biomedical -> bio medical, bio-medical, medical ctk-widgets.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US biomedical -> bio medical, bio-medical, medical ctk-widgets.i686: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libCTKWidgets.so.0.1.0 exit@GLIBC_2.0 ctk-widgets.i686: W: no-documentation 8 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings. All OK. Package is APPROVED. Please fix the noarch issue and the summary. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
