https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1118740
--- Comment #22 from Yaakov Selkowitz <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Harald Hoyer from comment #21) > (In reply to Harald Hoyer from comment #20) > > I would rather go down the road and create an opt-in scheme, where packages > > remove the > > %systemd_requires > > macro, if the package is able to run without systemd. > > Requires(post): systemd > Requires(preun): systemd > Requires(postun): systemd > > would become > > Recommends: systemd > OrderWithRequires(post): systemd > OrderWithRequires(preun): systemd > OrderWithRequires(postun): systemd That may very well be a better approach overall, but I'm not sure about the Recommends:, I think Suggests: or nothing at all would make more sense in at least some cases. What that does require is for systemd to handle all previously installed (but deferred) presets in %post [ $1 == 1 ]. How exactly? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
