https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315870
--- Comment #23 from [email protected] --- (In reply to Neil Horman from comment #22) > Just because the source has multiple license options, doesn't mean you just > pass that through to the binary. The dual license option is for use when > you have multiple binaries in a given binary rpm, some of which have license > X, some of which have license Y. If they all are being distributed under the > same license, then you either need to: That's not the way I read it. I think you are describing the "Multiple license" option, not "Dual license". All binaries have the same license (GPL/BSD). "Multiple" license is when there are different licenses for different binaries. That is not the case here. I think Honggang is correct in comment 21. Please confirm? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
