Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626122 --- Comment #3 from Chen Lei <[email protected]> 2010-08-26 10:57:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > I'm not sure what to suggest as an alternative, but IMHO "libqmf" is a rather > misleading/confusing name for this package. > - This proposed 'libqmf' doesn't appear to contain any libqmf.so > - Fedora already has a 'qmf' RPM that does provide a libqmf.so This is a git snapshot actually, no formal tarball available currently. I also doubt the pkgname, I sent a private mail to a maintainer of qmf, but haven't got any response yet. I use libqmf as the pkgname mainly because the package install api docs to %{_docdir}/libqmf-doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
