https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1337434
--- Comment #3 from David King <[email protected]> --- I think that I have the Provides correct now, quoting from <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Renaming.2FReplacing_Existing_Packages>: * flatpak provides only xdg-app (no isa) because it's just some standalone programs ("Even though these programs may themselves be arch-specific, clients that run them should not care about their arch in most cases.") * flatpak-builder provides only xdg-app-builder, by the same reasoning as flatpak * the -libs and -devel packages provide only xdg-app-libs%{?_isa} and xdg-app-libs-devel%{_isa} ("Examples of packages that should explicitly provide only arch-specific Provides: include native code libraries or plug-ins and their associated -devel packages.") Does that seem right? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
