https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #32 from Neil Horman <[email protected]> --- Rick, ideally it would be better if you just removed the libraries that you are pulling in via build requires from the project alltogether, but given that the license tag is supposed to apply to the binary rpm, I suppose its ok for them just to be there in the source tarball without the license included in the %files section if you have to do it that way (though I am not a lawyer) Regarding the license location, thats odd. Perhaps thats where java packages them, nomnially tagging a license file moves it to /usr/share/doc/licenses. But as long as youve tagged the file I think we're good -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
