https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342743
--- Comment #4 from Raphael Groner <[email protected]> --- Besides running the unit tests after a package build, defing one of DEBUG, DEBUG_DIAGNOSTICS or DEBUG_TEST may help with further abrt reports, too. Please consider to do so, though I can't tell what's best for abrt, propably DEBUG is sufficient. > [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. > Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses > found: "LGPL (v2.1 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)", "GPL (v3 > or later)", "Unknown or generated", "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "BSD (2 > clause)", "BSD (3 clause) GPL (v2 or later)", "*No copyright* MIT/X11 > (BSD like)". 1507 files have unknown license. The combined license and the amount of unlicensed files let suspect bundled libraries. You MUST add a license breakdown as comment, what individual file is licensed how. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bundled_Libraries?rd=Packaging:Bundled_Libraries -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
