https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1335278
--- Comment #27 from Antonio Trande <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Julian Sikorski from comment #26) > I am not sure what do you mean about LICENSE files not being packaged - the > 10 LICENSE files are actually part of mame-data and > mame-data-software-lists. Please may you elaborate? Are part of mame-data but not tagged with %license (this macro pushes license files in /usr/share/licenses/package_name). I think you should rename them by indicating the type of license and tag them with %license. > - Made ldplayer dependent on the main package Does 'ldplayer' really depend by 'mame' package ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
