https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332306
schla...@users.sourceforge.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |schlaffi@users.sourceforge.
| |net
--- Comment #2 from schla...@users.sourceforge.net ---
Just some positive feedback. Thanks for bringing libcxx and libcxxabi to
fedora. For my use, I sometimes prefer/need to build with clang++ and libcxx.
So it is not only the exotic "C++11 in R" case.
I ended here, because I was wondering why there is a libcxx but no libcxxabi. I
think in (almost?) all cases libc++.so requires libc++abi.so. I see you added
the dependency to libcxx. Looking forward to pull also libcxxabi from fedora
updates :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
