https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332306
[email protected] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected]. | |net --- Comment #2 from [email protected] --- Just some positive feedback. Thanks for bringing libcxx and libcxxabi to fedora. For my use, I sometimes prefer/need to build with clang++ and libcxx. So it is not only the exotic "C++11 in R" case. I ended here, because I was wondering why there is a libcxx but no libcxxabi. I think in (almost?) all cases libc++.so requires libc++abi.so. I see you added the dependency to libcxx. Looking forward to pull also libcxxabi from fedora updates :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
