https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1335988
--- Comment #20 from Jerry James <loganje...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #19)
> (In reply to Jerry James from comment #17)
> > Provides: bundled(tinymt32)
>
> Where is in Fedora ?
It isn't in Fedora. I'm just thinking the fact that it is bundled should be
noted so that, should it ever be introduced into Fedora, its presence in this
package can be determined.
> > - The documentation bundles some javascript code:
> > o doc/codemirror.{css,js} (MIT)
> > o doc/FileSaver.js (MIT)
> > o doc/matchbrackets.js (MIT)
>
> Should be packaged in %_jsdir ?
No, I don't think so. I think they are fine where they are; again, I'm just
wondering if the spec file shouldn't note the fact that these are bundled in
the package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
