https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353606
--- Comment #4 from mulhern <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Julien Enselme from comment #2) > > I want to make sure that this isn't just an oversight. > > It's not an oversight. I am the maintainer of python-toml. > > > Why is this desirable when there is python-toml package in Fedora currently? > > I initially used python-toml in my applications. But the support for TOML 4 > is not complete. I tried to improve it (I contributed for inline object > support) but the maintainer is slow to respond and still hasn't published a > new version with this support. Furthermore, I find the code hard to read and > modify. From what I looked at pytoml, it is better written, has a better > support of toml including edge cases. > > I'd recommend python-pytoml but for some usage, python-toml will do the > trick just fine (I find it a little easier to use). That's why I'll keep > maintaining it for the foreseeable future. Great, that makes sense. And thanks for agreeing to the swap! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
