https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353064
--- Comment #6 from Raphael Groner <[email protected]> --- As said, it's about gtest licensed under BSD. However, as we do not build it into binary rpm, this confirms with the guidelines as they always talk about binary compared to source RPM: "The License: field refers to the licenses of the contents of the *binary* rpm. When in doubt, ask." https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License:_field "If a subpackage is dependent (either implicitly or explicitly) upon a base package (where a base package is defined as a resulting *binary* package from the same source RPM which contains the appropriate license texts as %license), it is not necessary for that subpackage to also include those license texts as %license." https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Subpackage_Licensing I doubt css, md and script files need a license header. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
