https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359473



--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Ben Rosser from comment #3)
> Thanks for taking a look! Updated source and spec, also some comments below:
> 
> Spec URL: https://tc01.fedorapeople.org/dwarffortress/legendsbrowser.spec
> SRPM URL:
> https://tc01.fedorapeople.org/dwarffortress/legendsbrowser-1.0.12-2.fc24.src.
> rpm
> 
> > require are generate during the build
> 
> My bad; for some reason, I assumed this was not the case. (This is my first
> Java package).

see spec file attached added
Requires:      mvn(commons-collections:commons-collections)
Requires:      mvn(commons-lang:commons-lang)
because them are missing in classpath

> > %dir %{_javadir}/%{name}
> > prevent duplicate file
> Is this no longer necessary? I was following this possibly obsolete document
> on Java packaging
> (https://fedorahosted.org/released/javapackages/doc/#maven) and it had a
> %dir file include of that form. Anyway, I commented it out in the updated
> spec.

yes is not necessary

> > Add for each single JS library or fonts : Provides: bundled(foo) =fooversion
> 
> Whoops. Added this information, and updated license accordingly ("and BSD
> and CC-BY").

OFL: fontawesome-fonts-web (our spec file use this license)

> > Seem also which most of the java/source code are without license headers.
> 
> > Please, ask to upstream to confirm the licensing of code and/or content/s,
> and add license headers
> 
> I actually sort of have already have done so, although I did not ask for
> licensing headers-- prior to me filing
> https://github.com/robertjanetzko/LegendsBrowser/issues/9, upstream was not
> even distributing a LICENSE file or making any other reference to the
> license of the software that I could find (!). I can follow up though and
> verify that *all* the code that isn't third-party JS/CSS/fonts is indeed MIT
> if this is not sufficient.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]

Reply via email to