https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350143

Dave Johansen <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|needinfo?(davejohansen@gmai |
                   |l.com)                      |



--- Comment #4 from Dave Johansen <[email protected]> ---
Sorry for the delay. We moved and I haven't had time to work on this sort of
thing.

(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #2)
> [!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
>      Note: No known owner of /usr/share/cmake/fmt, /usr/include/fmt
> [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
>      Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/cmake,
>      /usr/share/cmake/fmt, /usr/include/fmt

Fixed.

> [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
>      Provides are present.

This is actually a rename of cppformat but I believe that these are correct.

> Generic:
> [!]: Avoid bundling fonts in non-fonts packages.
>      Note: Package contains font files

This came up during the original review of cppformat and the general consensus
was that it wasn't an issue:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/EKVX5GCQUFINUYBRGFD2JQHF2UXUBBVV/

> [!]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
>      justified.

Fixed.

> fmt.x86_64: W: tag-in-description C Provides:
> fmt.x86_64: W: tag-in-description C Obsoletes:

Is there something wrong with my Provides/Obsoletes?

> fmt.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 3.0.0-1 ['3.0.0-0.1.fc25',
> '3.0.0-0.1']

Fixed.

> fmt-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib

I don't understand what this is warning about.

The updated .spec file with the fixes is at:
https://daveisfera.fedorapeople.org/fmt_3.0.0/fmt.spec

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]

Reply via email to